Does self-direction work?
Some policymakers, providers, and family members are skeptical that people with serious mental health conditions are capable of self-direction. These perceptions get in the way of not only the broader adoption of self-direction but also the rights of individuals to pursue meaningful, independent lives in the community.
Below, we share findings from independent, nonpartisan evaluations of self-direction efforts—including our own evaluation, the Demonstration of Self-Direction in Behavioral Health—to help dispel these misconceptions.
Major Evaluations of Self-Direction
Published Research on Self-Direction
(descending order by date)
Mental Health Self-Directed Care Financing: Efficacy in Improving Outcomes and Controlling Costs for Adults With Serious Mental Illness
By Judith Cook, Samuel Shore, Jane Burke-Miller, Jessica Jonikas, Marie Hamilton, Brandy Ruckdeschel, Walter Norris, Anna Frost Markowitz, Matthew Ferrara & Dulal Bhaumik
Published online in Psychiatric Services, January 2019
This study examined the effects of self-direction on outcomes, service costs, and user satisfaction among adults with serious mental illness. Researchers compared 114 public mental health system clients who were self-directing with 102 clients who were receiving services as usual. Self-directed care participants had significantly greater improvement over time in recovery, self-esteem, coping mastery, autonomy support, somatic symptoms, employment, and education.
Money matters: participants’ purchasing experiences in a budget authority model of self-directed care
By Jennifer Spaulding-Givens, Shannon Hughes & Jeffrey R. Lacasse
Published online in Social Work in Mental Health, December 2018
This qualitative study reports findings from interviews with 18 SDC participants on the factors that influence their purchasing decisions, the benefits derived from SDC purchases, and perceived barriers experienced in making desired purchases. Findings reveal the extent to which money matters in mental health recovery and suggest that individualized budgeting and purchasing contribute to SDC participants’ mental wellness and stability, enhance their control over service choices, and, most notably, provide some material relief in ongoing struggles with chronic poverty. Findings also highlight the importance of flexible spending guidelines and streamlined approval processes; overly proscriptive policies may undermine participants’ self-determination.
By Bevin Croft, Nilufer Isvan, Susan L. Parish, and Kevin J. Mahoney
Published online in Psychiatric Services, May 2018
Looking at data from the nation’s largest and longest-standing self-direction effort, FloridaSDC, researchers compared outcomes of housing independence and employment between individuals who participated in self-direction and those who did not. The researchers analyzed deidentified data on 271 self-directing participants across two FloridaSDC programs and compared this data to a matched group (composed of individuals with similar characteristics) of 1,099 nonparticipants. Compared with nonparticipants, self-directing participants were more likely to improve, or maintain at high levels, engagement in paid work and independent housing.
By Bevin Croft, Lori Simon-Rusinowitz, Dawn M. Loughlin, and Kevin J. Mahoney
Published in Social Work in Mental Health, December 2017
Using a descriptive cross-sectional study, the researchers used a survey (n = 46) and interviews (n = 17) to gauge mental health program directors' expectations for self-direction and to identify barriers and facilitators for adoption and implementation. Respondents showed strong interest in self-direction and endorsed its potential to support well-being and improve mental health service quality. Respondents also voiced concerns, including competing agency priorities, provider resistance, and administrative challenges.
Exploring Personal Medicine as Part of Self-Directed Care: Expanding Perspectives on Medical Necessity
By Gretchen Snethen, Andrea Bilger, Erme C. Maula, and Mark S. Salzer
Published in Psychiatric Services, April 2016
The authors examined the types of goods and services that individuals with serious mental illness request in a self-directed care intervention, analyzing the requests and purchases of 60 participants who had been randomly assigned to an intervention. They concluded that self-directed care may be a service delivery option that allows consumers to access their own personal medicine and better address their needs.
By Bevin Croft, HSRI, and Susan Parish,
Published in the Community Mental Health Journal, February 2016
The authors analyzed the content of 30 in-depth interviews with individuals from two self-direction programs, and found a positive relationship between self-direction and recovery. They found that self-directing participants first sought to meet basic needs for food, clothing, and shelter with their support funds - as the initial first step in their recovery. The authors also found that participants' gains in one area led to achievement in others, fostered by a growing sense of independence, self-esteem, and self-confidence.
By Jennifer Spaulding-Givens and Jeffrey Lacasse
Published in Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, March 2015
The authors examined the demographic characteristics, service utilization patterns, and outcomes of individuals enrolled in the Florida Self-Directed Care (FloridaSDC) program. They concluded that participants’ service purchases were rational given the poverty in which they live, and that their outcomes did not suffer when they controlled decisions regarding their service needs. The findings highlight the utility and value of the personalized budgeting and individualized planning components of SDC. The findings also point to the need for practitioners to implement innovative strategies to enhance participants’ employment readiness and supported employment opportunities.
By Martin Webber, Samantha Treacy, Sarah Carr, Mike Clark, and Gillian Parker
Published in the Journal of Mental Health, May 2014
The authors reviewed 15 studies to examine the effectiveness of personal budgets for people with mental health problems. They found mostly positive outcomes in terms of choice and control, quality of life, service use and cost-effectiveness. However, they also point to methodological limitations that made their findings rather unreliable and insufficient, and they call for further studies to inform policy and practice for mental health service users.
By Judith A. Cook, Carolyn Russell, Dennis D. Grey, Jessica A. Jonikas
Published in Psychiatric Services, June 2008
The authors examined data on 106 individuals in self-directed care programs and found that, compared to the year prior to their enrollment, participants spent significantly less time in psychiatric inpatient and criminal justice settings in the year after their enrollment, and showed considerably better functioning. They also found that of approximately $58,000 in participants' expenditures over 19 months, 47% was spent on traditional psychiatric services, 13% on service substitutions for traditional care, 29% on tangible goods, 8% on uncovered medical care, and 3% on transportation.
Does Mental Illness Affect Consumer Direction of Community-Based Care? Lessons From the Arkansas Cash and Counseling Program
By Ce Shen, Michael A. Smyer, Kevin J. Mahoney, Dawn M. Loughlin, Lori Simon-Rusinowitz, and Ellen K. Mahoney
Published in The Gerontologist, February 2008
The authors compared and contrasted the experience of elderly participants in the Cash and Counseling program with and without mental health diagnoses. They found that, from the perspective of consumers, the program works well for participants with mental health diagnoses: showing positive outcomes with respect to satisfaction with care arrangements and the paid caregiver's reliability and schedule, unmet needs, and satisfaction with the relationship with paid caregivers.
Consumer-Directed Care for Beneficiaries With Mental Illness: Lessons From New Jersey's Cash and Counseling Program
By Ce Shen, Michael Smyer, Kevin J. Mahoney, Lori Simon-Rusinowit, Judith Shinogle, Julie Norstrand, Ellen Mahoney, Carole Schauer, and Paolo del Vecchio
Published in Psychiatric Services, November 2008
This study examined nonelderly Medicaid beneficiaries with a diagnosis of mental illness, comparing and contrasting the experiences of those in New Jersey's Cash and Counseling program with those receiving services provided by an agency. Based on an examination of outcome measures, the authors found that, from the perspective of consumers, self-direction is appropriate for participants with a mental health diagnosis. They also found that self-directing participants in the study were at least as safe as those in agency-directed care.
Other Materials (Reports, Essays, Webinars)
The Temple Collaborative on Community Inclusion produced this 2019 calendar featuring actual resource requests from self-direction participants to give others inspiration in creating their own personalized plans.
Bevin Croft, PhD., MPP, Research Associate, Human Services Research Institute (HSRI)
Briana Gilmore, MSc., Director of Planning and Recovery Practice, Community Access
Keith Aguiar, Self-Direction Pilot Program Manager, Community Access
Oyeama (“Zisa”) Okpalor, NY Program Participant
Recorded June 26, 2018
Within the public mental health system, self-direction supports people in developing and directing their own services to help reach their own goals for recovery and independence. New York State’s Office of Mental Health has begun implementing a self-direction pilot that pairs each person’s own recovery plan with a flexible budget to purchase goods and services relevant to their goals. This webinar: 1) Provides an overview of self-direction models and outcomes research to assist people with serious mental illnesses; 2) Describes how New York’s model was developed and adopted during a shifting Medicaid managed care environment, including successful advocacy strategies; 3) Discusses operational concerns such as provider training and outreach during New York’s first pilot year; and 4) Reports on early participant outcomes related to the pilot.
Featuring Bevin Croft, Julie Schnepp, and Pam Werner
Recorded February 27, 2018
This webinar begins with an introduction to self-direction, including a brief history and the places that are testing it out. There are three perspectives shared:
Bevin Croft, MPP, PhD – Research Associate at the Human Services Research Institute. The research that has been done, preliminary results here and in England. Future directions in research and funding for research.
Julie Schnepp – has participated in the Consumer Recovery Investment Fund Self Directed Care Program for the last seven years. During this time she has become a Certified Peer Specialist with additional training in working with youth and young adults, older adults, forensics, LGBTQA+ and more.
Pam Werner – Manager with the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services in the Office of Recovery Oriented Systems of Care.
By Bevin Croft, HSRI, Kaipeng Wang, Benjamin Cichocki, HSRI, Anne Weaver, and Kevin Mahoney
Published in Psychiatric Services Open Forum, January 2017
This Open Forum essay describes an an international learning exchange meeting, held in September 2015, in which experts in self-direction and mental health from seven nations convened to share best practices, discuss challenges, and lay the groundwork for a learning community to support the continued development of self-direction. Meeting participants identified three themes that represent next steps toward ensuring that the promise of self-direction is realized. First, self-direction involves a culture shift toward value-based systems change. Second, people with lived experience must be involved and supported at every level, including direct support, leadership, and oversight. Third, stakeholder communication about self-direction’s impact is critical.
By Bevin Croft, HSRI, Lori Simon-Rusinowitz, Dawn Loughlin, and Kevin Mahoney
The authors conducted an environmental scan to understand the facilitators and barriers to self-direction in behavioral health (that is, mental health and substance use disorders) and to develop parameters for a large-scale demonstration and evaluation project.
See also: "Environmental Scan of Self-Direction in Behavioral Health: A Review of the Literature" and "Looking at Self-Directed Services for People with Serious Mental Illness or Substance-Use Issues"
By Eric Slade
Prepared Report for the Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
This report provides a review of available information on self-directed care (SDC) programs in mental health care settings (as of 2011, the year of publication) and discusses potential policy implications of large-scale implementation of SDC programs serving persons with serious mental illness.
By Vidhya Alakeson
Published in Psychiatric Services Open Forum, July 2008
This Open Forum essay identifies three main barriers that explain the limited adoption of self-direction as of 2008: the absence of a strong evidence base to support the effectiveness of self-directed care for serious mental illness, uncertainty over the appropriate scope of self-directed care, and the absence of a sustainable source of funding. The author states that a large-scale evaluation could help to address the first two barriers, and that the introduction of the 1915(i) provision of the Social Security Act in 2007 could partly address the funding barrier.